The starting point of this adventure might have been rather normal, since at each beginning of a new year, I exercise myself with some kind of forecast work concerning the year to come.
It's not a matter of divination at all, just a kind of check up on the global energies underway. It doesn't seem unreasonable to me that some of the events to come might be foreseen because in spite of the fact that they about the future, they are not different from any other facts : they have roots, they grow and finally come to maturity, but rarely on a single day.
The unexpected phenomenon that this work revealed to me was a very abnormal and very exceptional activity of the sun.
I first wondered if it could be a matter of natural cycles and if the phenomenon had possibly already occurred in the past . As a matter of fact, I found an anteriority, but approximately 23.500 years ago, which is a lot, nevertheless, for our small human memories.
Moreover, at this previous time, the increase of the solar radiance would not have been more than 60% of what it is likely to be in this good year 2006.
So, not a very common event indeed, which deserved, in my opinion, that I payed a little attention to it.
I must acknowledge that at the early beginning of the year, I was as much amazed as a bit exhausted by the scope of the whole thing, but, however, I began my ant's work consisting of a daily survey that you can consult on the daily survey page. In comparison to the initial forecast, I noticed that the real time measurements seemed to globaly follow the tendencies of the forecast, despite some fluctuations in terms of reactivity.
Perhaps, with regard to these measurements, some of you will regret the lack of a scale, but it did not seem interesting to me to mention any measure's units which calibration remains extremely doubtful to me and which interpretation can widely vary from one person to another. So, they are just raw data of a subjective kind, I am well aware of it, but permitting us anyway to show evolutions or tendencies.
These daily fluctuations generate the variation of two other values which I named "dysfunction threshold" and "morbidity threshold".
Here again, these thresholds are obtained by means of dowsing, and underline vibratory levels which enable the process of any life system according to a given vibratory pattern. This concept of vibratory pattern is of primary importance since, as one will see it in the synthesis of the year 2006, it seems that we observed, for a part of humanity, something like a change of reference.
At all events, the vibratory "compatibility-fork" with the world which surrounds us (the super cosmotelluric ecosystem), remains rather broad although one may consider the existence of a release level (which will not be treated/approached here), and a collapse level.
The collapse level is far easier to conceive since as mortal beings, we know illness and death. Illness may be considered as a reversible collapse phenomenon, and death, until proof of the opposite, as an irreversible collapse phenomenon, (at least, for what is related to the matter we are all made of).
These two thresholds show the state of risk for any living system at a specific moment. If the crossing of the dysfunction threshold should draw our attention since it is significant of a real imbalance, the crossing of the morbidity threshold, for stronger reason, should really alert us because it is significant of a system potentially in phase of destruction.
It seemed to me interesting to apply this examination method to human societies and places where they live. I thus carried out twice a month since the beginning of the year, dowsing measurements of each country in the world. Since it comes up to a huge amount of information , I decided for the moment to publish an alert board by continent, only mentioning countries below the "morbidity threshold" at a present time.
But just as for a human being, it is never enough to know that something's going wrong, it is also necessary to identify the origin of a problem. Then, in a second approach, we can get a more detailed view of the aspect which implies morbidity.
Why a semi-monthly examination ? First of all, because a frequency is needed anyway, neither too fast because work is time-consuming, nor too slow to remain as much as possible in phase with events. Since human being is mainly composed of water, it seemed apropriate to refer to the moon cycles. I thus chose the synodical cycle, although it is not necessarily the most significant. My observations tend to show a higher synchronicity with the anomalistic cycle and it is not impossible that I will take advantage of the synchronization of these two cycles, at the beginning of September, to jump from the one to the other.
It's true, however, that this frequency introduces some unavoidable drawbacks, because it doesn't always make possible to highlight accidental events which generaly occur very quickly. For exemple, with regard to the situation in eastern Timor, it appeared as a sudden collapse in an alert board made few days before the events, but on the other hand, with regard to the Indonesian earthquake, it only appeared in an alert board made few days after the events. This is still the main problem with a fortnight beetween each examination.
I will not conceal that, as far as I'm concerned, I usually monitor my close relations' spots or my own place of living in a daily basis.
Starting from 2007 the alert boards are published under subscription but it is still possible to add any specific spot monitoring, whatever the frequency. Please, contact me for any evaluation..