- Genesis
- Used Techniques
- Paradoxes of Time
- Intuition
- Remote Working
- Different kinds of test
- Conclusion
Q: Gwelan, you are introducing « Colours of Life », your energy investigation method. Can you explain its principles?
A : With pleasure ! There is a method which is widely used in astronomy to learn about the features of stars : it is to observe how they absorb and restore light. I took this principle as a starting point on the basis of the simple idea that everything is energy, and that thus, the way a person or a particular situation absorbs and restores this energy must necessarily inform us about its state.
Q: What is your personal approach about energy ?
A: I have a rather intuitive approach, especially in the vibration domain. You know, I've been in the music business for all my life, and when we play music, we feel these things in a very instinctive way because after all, it's the core of the art itself but also the core of the relationship with the public which is something very strange, that we can feel without really knowing with which organ. These things are perfectly impalpable but anyway their perception is a main part of the job.
As I was rather intuitive, apart from music, I had always been very interested in what we call the sixth sense, until I came to realize that this sens could also be worked, and then I jumped to the heart of the subject, through magnetism, parapsychology, mediumship, geobiology, dowsing, disciplines of that kind.
Q: But these disciplines are still highly controversial, aren't they ?
A: Yes, it's the least we can say, but we don't do them only fair trials, you know. This is already partly linked to the position of the humanities in general in our societies. Then, these controversies are understandable to some extent insofar as these disciplines are actually related to personal abilities and that there is no standard for sensitivity, it depends on each person. But from a strictly theoretical point of view, quantum physics has been there for over a hundred years now, and field theory allows not only to explain but also to modelise these types of phenomenon.
We must absolutely let the people know that we live in the 21st century now ! Well, anyway, it gives a little flavor of forbidden, so I don't know what is better, if it is to be recognized or be desirable.
Q: Then, how does one pass from music to energy readings ?
A : It is a whole set of circumstances, personal experiences, awarenesses. You do not wake up one morning by saying : " Well, now I will do that ! ". It is progressive, it takes time. We are even rather reluctant when some friends tell us : " You should be consultant ! ". It looks like a big step: it is a real commitment ! So, we move on, but a bit with the reverse gear.
Q: What do you mean by commitment ?
A: The fact that it is still a human activity and I do not believe that any human activity can claim perfection. So, accepting this activity, it's also assuming the possibility of error. You know, for example, that today in France, doctors are required to treat their patients, but without any obligation to cure them, and after all, they are only doctors, not miracle makers, but I think it's a rather comfortable status as compared to what is generally expected from sensitive practitioners. So, at the beginning, we have that a bit like a sword over the head, and with time, let's say it becomes less dramatic, less theatrical, but it still comes back occasionally when we find ourselves with things a little difficult to announce.
Q : How long have you been practicing these energy readings ?
A: For about fifteen years now, but it's a process that never ceased to progress for all this time. I went through different phases, I implemented several types of approach or technique that each had their own qualities and drawbacks, but which mostly had the advantage to show me the energy reality from different angles.
Q: Can you tell a bit more about the different techniques you've been using ?
A: If you want. To make it short, at the beginning I practiced mainly remote viewing. For that, I used Raymond Réant 's technique which does not imply any catalepsy or deep trance. That was absolutely an exciting school but with a major drawback anyway, because when you project yourself many hours a day, at the end, you never totally reintegrate yourself, you're always ready to go. Then I came to dowsing which has the great advantage to facilitate rooting since it can be practiced only if you are strongly entrenched. Just the opposite. But I was a bit short of emotion. As a musician, emotion is something important for me, it is talking to me. And here I must say that through mediumship, I've been served as a Prince ! But again, a major drawback, since I needed someone else to ask questions and record answers. Finally, over time, I think I just kept the best of all these approaches. It's certainly not a very academic mixture, but it suits me well as it allows me to practice my speciality while leading an almost normal life.
Q: How would you describe the procedure that you apply now ?
A: This is an approach that is as intuitive as possible. In this kind of activity, we have to process rather unusual informations, since the subject of the study is the energy field, be it a person, a country or a house, etc ... These are raw data if you want ; it does not speak human, it uses another language, extremely subtle, rich and meaningful, sometimes even extremely fast. The double problem is already to hear as accurately as possible and then bring this information back without betraying it. All the problem, most of the times, is how to introduce a big into a small. So I came to use light and colors as an intermediate language, hence the name of "Colors of Life". This color code that integrates several simultaneous levels of meaning is for me a kind of holographic reading method that allows me not to fix the meaning too quickly. The investigation can be conducted a bit like a photographic development in a darkroom, ie, gradually and all the way as a whole. That means that the method requires patience and a good cooperation of reason and intuition. I even would add imagination, since association of ideas seems to me a rather imaginative characteristic.
Q : Q: What can someone wait or withdraw from that kind of investigation of its own energies?
A: Mainly, a greater mastery of its own life, I think. Self-knowledge is extremely important, I agree, but it is a bit like a bottomless pit, also, isn't it ? In a pragmatic point of view, there is one thing that reveals itself to be very useful, it is the ability to reorientate a trajectory, especially when it leads directly into a wall. This is what we are doing when we drive our car, for example : we are anticipating all the time, depending on the road, the weather, our speed, etc ...
Q: But there are lot of people who think that what happens "must" happen.
A: Yes, and it is perfectly their right, but here you bring me to the field of belief and it's not at all the purpose of my work. The reality I observe is simply the one in which our choices affect the course of events. I will keep myself from philosophize about the origin or the range of such a fact. I just note that we are equipped with what allows us to estimate reality and react to it, and my approach in this context is just a possibility of optimization of this assessment.
You know, today, physicists speak of interlacing ; Isn't it a beautiful image to describe a universe where everything is inter-connected ? But it is precisely because everything is inter-connected and moving permanently that we never have enough perspective. We are always a train late : we can analyse but the past, because it alone is stable. The fact that people come to rely on a notion as random as fate, it's maybe just a confession of impotence with regard to the colossal mass of information that the universe delivers at each moment. But you surely know this expression: "they did not know it was impossible, then they did it." Our reason for being, it is maybe to plunge all the same our net inside, and get something to bring back home.
I think that here is the main interest of these energy readings : to allow us to take out of this mass of information, something useful. It allows to better estimate the aspects that determine the present and also identify the levers to be used to reorientate the future in a way more in line with our expectations.
Q: Do you really think we can change the future?
A: If we change the present, we necessarily change the future! The present contains the seeds of the future. They are within us, in our minds, our desires, our fears ... Anyway, that we want it or not, we create future because these seeds of future that we carry within us have inherently the energy to come to reality. This is but a matter of maturation. It's a bit like the growth of plants: one day you can see the buds appear, but it is neither by chance nor by magic: it is the result of an invisible work inside the plant itself. It's the same for us. We just need to integrate the fact that there is not one future but several. Several levels do co-exist because some seeds are more or less collective and some others more personnal. Each has its own energy systems. That's the reason why, when a disaster happens, what can be considered as a mass demonstration, there are also people who survive because the seeds of future they have in them do not participate in or undergo this kind of event.
So what seems interesting is already to have an overall assessment of the seeds that determine the collective state of the world, or of the place where we live (and which are very far from being exclusively of a human origin) but also, of course, an estimation of the seeds we carry personaly.
I'll take an example: when driving our car, there are signs on the roadside to prevent danger. But it is going to warn us of fixe dangers : a turn, a crossroads, etc ... The best GPS in the world will never tell us: "be careful, in 650 m you could cross a completely drunk guy that does not keep right" or " frightened doe preparing to cross the road at the exit of the next turn or "mobile radar hidden in a small grove at 9 km, etc ... These are extremely common things but which are what we generally consider as contingencies while these situations are like any others : they have roots, there is no spontaneous generation in this domain. These roots may be invisible but they do exist in the energy field. They are available, we can go read them, this is not something that is about imagination. (these roots are made for reading ! ...)
The combination of the trajectory of the doe and the one of our car, is written in the energy field. Depending on whether or not we receive this information, there will be an accident, or there will not be . In that sense, we can say that knowledge protects.
Q: Isn't there a problem to be notified of an event to come too much in advance? I guess that it must not induce the same kind of reaction than really being faced to the event itself.
A: Yes, in emergencies, the choices are always kept to a minimum, and these situations are at the same time more dangerous but simpler. Any advance gives us time, but requires from us an effort of thinking, of imagination. We've got a greater free choice but also a kind of responsibility that everybody don't necessarily want to assume.
Q: If you want, a likely future is not something sure, so we can understand it could be difficult for some people to give credit to such information.
A: Yes, by definition, any assessment of the future is of the realm of probability, but a probability which is anything but random: it has, on the contrary, roots, and it is these roots that are the subject of these readings. Anyway, the only thing that can be absolutely certain is the one which already occurred. Unfortunately, it happens that it is also the one on which we strictly have no possibility of intervention. It seems to me that if there is something on which we can intervene, it is our future. And about that, self-knowledge is certainly very important, but we must be careful : walking by looking at our own navel is the best way to take a lamp in the corner of the figure. So we also need an assessment of what's coming and which is not just coming from us but also from all that surrounds us.
But I agree, there are many ways to esimate the course of events, but if we just consider the actual climatic or economic forecasts, we can really ask ourselves about the reliability of our tools, and if they really dispense ourselves of any other approach.
For example, I've been very moved by the story of these elephants during the 2004 tsunami, which had felt the danger coming, and went to the shelter by disobeying their mahout. So they not only saved their own lives, but also that of those they had on their backs. And I remember very well some comments at this time, which were wondering why we found so few dead wild animals. ! What a lesson all these animals did give us, anyway! And without any technology!
Our ancients, who still had a very acute sense of premonition, used to think a lot about warning signs. For sure, they took it a lot of different ways, that of course, make greatly laughing all these very serious people who spend their time keeping the accounts and nevertheless lead us to a brilliant general bankruptcy.
Q: Is it a kind of vision of the futur that you deliver here ?
A: Oh, it's a future that is already very present, don't you think ?
If you want : becoming intellectual animals, we lost this ability to read in the present time the seeds of the future and therefore we also lost a lot of confidence in our personal power. But it's something that we can - and that we must - find again, anyway, because just rely on a supposed secure society, ultimately, it is not only a nightmare but now we know it does not work at all.
This is where quantum physics has made us an extraordinary gift by allowing us to re-address in another way, domains that were hitherto regarded as irrational. Now, the beyond , we can call it differently : we can speak of the energy fields behind the alive. We know that this is the realm of reality, that it is quantifiable, we can make equations of it, we can derive applications from it. There are scientists like Rupert Sheldrake or François Martin who have done extraordinary works about the modeling of consciousness fields, until discussing from a mathematical point of view, what might keep on existing in the state of death ; what opens up absolutely huge perspectives. Now, that a lot of people have still not aware of this cultural revolution is unfortunately obvious, even among intellectuals or scientists, but to each one it's problem, I would say. The most important is that our rational mind may feel legitimate in this re-appropriation of the hidden side of things, without having to manage impossible conflicts or simply have to face the fear of ridiculousness.
Q: Yes but if people really start to use their intuitive faculties, they will be able to do without your services!
A: Yes, you're right, it's a profession with no future, is it what you mean? Already as a musician, I was told that it was not a real job ! I guess it must be a karma !
However, it is not change that will be done in a day. Now, we are still between two worlds, and the materialism inherited from the 19th century still widely influence human activities. And as to solve problems, we generaly use the methods that are precisely those which created the problems, something tells me that maybe, we're not yet out of it ! I guess we may be increasingly faced with the need to radically change our patterns of thought, and in this context, people who have an approach of vibratory reality can probably be still useful for a while.
Q: Some might argue that this is not new and that in every troubled times, people tend to turn to the irrational.
A: Yes, but it is a speech of another time, and then, you know, reactions of contempt are often the ultimate defense of collapsing powers !
Well, I think it is rather the common sense of our species to have always kept somewhere this intuition that there is something else, another dimension to existence. It has resisted all oppressions : it survived the Church's Inquisition, it will survive the new world order, with my sincere apologies to all those who are keen to do our thinking for us.
Anyway, I am not in this dilemma which puts reason against intuition. I rather try to run on the most collaborative way as possible. I am not afraid of the confrontation with facts: I work with doctors or researchers. They submit their cases and I bring my insight. They assess it with their knowledge, advocate further examination of their own to validate what would have been revealed in a "reading." My part is to issue information and even often on subjects totally beyond me. Afterwards, everyone does what he wants with it, it doesn't belong to me. But it can sometimes highlight a pathology in an initial phase, before becoming symptomatic, while I am not a doctor, or optimize the development of technical systems as I am far from being an engineer. So, as long it delivers useful information, I'm OK with that.
Q : And how is it possible to work remotly ?
A: It is nothing magic, you know, there are principles that allow that. We just have to admit that energy is not related to space, either it is not of this nature, or it is so fast that space is not a problem at all. It is something that physics has demonstrated : two particles, even separated by a great distance, can share information instantaneously. I suppose it's the same principle, I just put it into practice, as most people just push the button of their remote control, without having the slightest idea of how a television works. The most important, is to identify properly the subject of the study.
But whether it is a person, a country, a house, a portfolio, anything you want ... everything is already separate and precisely identified in the universe in a way to avoid any confusion. That makes that when your neighbor wins the lottery, you're not richer for that, or when you hit your fingers, he's not the one who's hurt.
Q: And does this identification work all the time?
A: Most of the time, yes, but there are some uncommon situations where I can't do an examination. That's why, before accepting any order, I use to proceed to a systematic validation of the identification informations of the subject to be examined.
We must take care not to overestimate our own abilities and keep humility and caution in the implementation of the procedures because there is undeniably a background noise that is real and can be more or less disturbing, and also we should not underestimate the world in which we live. There are people who seek, by all means, to get information about others for purposes that are not always very friendly, or kinds of information that are more or less dangerous to be in possession of, so there are certain protections that play their role because this activity is not supposed neither to recklessly expose myself nor interfere in the privacy of individuals.
In theory, energy informations are of the public domain, but in fact, they stand at different vibratory levels and that requires a certain mobility to access to them and secondly we must be duly accredited to get them. They are protected informations in some way. The universe is right in front of our eyes and yet it conceals many mysteries. So when the forest is hiding the path, first, we must do like Tom Thumb, and climb trees to get a more distant horizon, or find a way with the stars. I'm just a guy who climbs trees finally! :-)
Q: ... or a seagull (gwelan) who can see things from above?
A: Yes, it's a bit the same idea!
But this notion of accreditation is fundamental and is permanently at the center of my work. I think that everyone has access to its own informations, those that directly affect its life, those relevant to its life, and as we live in osmosis in a very wide world, that makes a lot of informations available in theory. Most of the time, we can only recieve a small part of these informations because of our beliefs, our habits, our operating principles which maintain our consciousness in specific patterns, specific frequency ranges in which we are used to move about, but which filter and change the quantity and the type of information that we can access. But we can learn how to navigate within wider ranges, as we would choose the frequency of a radio station. After all, we are used to go to gyms to cultivate our body, one could imagine gyms of another kind where we could train ourselves and cultivate our awareness, our ability to move about in wider frequency ranges.
Anyway, in the meantime, we can ask someone to do the shopping for us. This is where I operate. But for that, I need a "shopping list" and a permission to be able to do it on behalf of a third party. We must not believe that energy realities are mills opened to all winds : we need to have papers in order ! And this accreditation, this permission is included in the request that is made to me. That is why when someone makes me a request for its own account, the situation is quite simple. When it is done for a third party but with its consent (either the person is not able to communicate, or is a child of tender age), we can still get a fairly good relevance. But when the investigation concerns a third party, without its consent, it quickly becomes much more complicated and the result may depend on the degree of genuine utility to be informed, or could be influenced by the motivations of the person making the request. These are not ideal situations.
But there is obviously the case of compatibility or recruitment tests for example. Although the request may be unilateral, a person or a company may be legitimate in their need of information because there is undeniably a part that concerns them directly. It can be answered to that because the choice of the person involves the one who makes the request, it is not a free curiosity.
Q: And why do you propose so many different tests?
A: It is both a matter of coherence of implemented means and also to allow little fortunate persons to access these investigations in a progressive way. You know that we are not yet reimbursed by social security! So we can first examine with a global approach some founders aspects, and if one or other of these aspects shows an unbalance of any kind, then it's worth it to examine the situation more in detail, but there is not an absolute necessity to do so if the initial examination reveals no particular dysfunction.
If you want, we don't pass 36 blood tests, two radios, three or four scanners just because of a little cold.
Q: What are these founder aspects you talked about ?
A: There is mainly three. I consider them as foundations actually : "the being, the enclosure and the provision". I described them in detail in the « Double approach », and « Foundations » Pages. Together they are a good indicator of health or viability. These three aspects are set up from the moment of the conception and their quality determines both the immediate viability and the future development of the embryo. But these aspects are equally significant at any ages, for someone as well as for a project to complete, for a commercial company, a country, a family, etc ...
Q: And on what basis, or on what criteria do you estimate these founders?
A: I subscribe to a very simple approach based on a notion of "viability". I compare a level of need with the quality of the response that is brought to this need. Either the response is adequate and everything is OK, or it is not and that will cause more or less severe dysfunctions and even breakdowns. I don't ask the question of the nature or the level of need in itself because I take a situation as it comes, it is not for me to judge it. Anything, if it exists, it fulfills the necessary conditions for life. What seems significant to me, is rather an excess or a weakness because there is not a single imbalance that can be trivial.
Q: And do you stick strictly to these three founders?
A: No, as I said, they appear mainly in the basic tests. First, because they seem significant enough to make good warnings, and secondly, because being not too many, they can quite easily be projected on a time scale. It remains in a dynamic, it highlights the current momentums, those seeds of future that we mentioned earlier, the trajectories on which we are. But of course, we can proceed to more detailed tests which will use a greater number of "sensors", a kind of High Definition if you want. This is where I use this approach with colors. It comes much more into the details of the operating principles. But it is a more complex implementation which requires more time.
Q : Q: You also offer compatibility tests. On the basis of which criterias do you set this compatibility?
A: I still subscribe to the same approach, ie the linking of a level of need with the quality of the response that is brought to it. Except that in a compatibility test, the level of need is related with the response that the other one is able to provide.
This works for people, but it also works well in assessing the merits of an association or of a move to a new residence, or whether a particular job may suit someone or whether someone will be able to perform a new function , etc ...
However, within the framework of a compatibility test, I always advise to first proceed to personal examinations to the extent that a specific problem may appear in a compatibility test, and yet not be the result of a real incompatibility, but just the expression on that plan of a problem that remains personal, although the fact that a relationship does not improve it, is already an information in itself.
Q: What do your reports look like?
A: It is said that a picture tells more than a thousand words, then I try to present as much as possible the examinations reports in a graphical form. There is a whole set of tests whose reading is very straightforward and doesn't need any extra comments. As against with respect to color based analysis, I systematically add a personalised report because I am not in situation today to attach a reading manual explicit enough.
Q: This color based reading method, is this something you intend to teach in one form or another?
A: I recieve demands of that kind, but it's a teaching that does not lend itself well to writing and quite honestly, I do not feel yet myself a soul of a lecturer ! But I will maybe... one day ... We'll see.
Q: And in your reports, do you really say everything ?
A: You know, I consider that from the moment somebody questions me, I am not going to hide him the answer it gets, it would not make any sense. I must say that I feel more at ease since I admitted that the answer did not belong to me more than the questioning. You know, in this kind of activity, we are mainly the postman : we deliver the mail, but we don't write the letters.
And then, we must never lose sight that we are open systems in an open world. These readings are not there to tell us what will happen for sure and that we'll only have to undergo, they are there to inform us, to challenge us, to enable us to make a greater use of our creative power.
Finally, one might almost say that these readings speak to the divine part we all carry within us to allow us to create our own lives a bit more, or a bit better.